Monday, June 9, 2014

An Argument from Organizational Behavior

Stephen Robbins, MBA textbook author on the subject, defines organizational behavior as "a field of study that investigates the impact that individuals, groups, and structure have on behavior within organizations, for the purpose of applying such knowledge toward improving an organization's effectiveness" (2014, page 11). It is a combined discipline of psychology, sociology, and anthropology as it relates to groups as part of a larger group. Leaders use the principles of organizational behavior to inject the strategy and mission of an organization into that organization's DNA. A leader defines effectiveness by how closely the organization operates in accordance with its mission and strategy. 
           
An organization can go to great lengths to build a mission and strategy but neglect to bring that mission and strategy to bear on every task, objective, department, and member. When this happens, the tasks, objectives, departments, and members create waste that perpetuates the organization's ineffectiveness. Tasks become superfluous to the mission and strategy. Objectives become shortsighted. Departments tenaciously compete with one another due to the present leadership's inability to remain true to the mission and strategy. Finally, members become victims of superfluous requirements, shortsighted objectives, and other members exerting their control in an effort to fill the perceived leadership void.
           
Self-coined, Modern-day Fundamentalists (the intentionally conservative, independent Evangelical brand of Christianity) by and large reflect a severe lack in understanding of the principles of organizational behavior. Despite the emphatic profession to be always adhering to the "fundamentals of the faith," they have neglected the pure mission and strategy of the Gospel for a practical theology that allows for Gospel rhetoric but adds subtle burdens that not only visibly discredit the Gospel but also quench the Holy Spirit from accomplishing His purpose in individual members of the local church.
           
Christ's mission to the members of His Church is simple yet potent enough to redeem a fallen world: Love God with all your heart, soul, and mind. Christ's strategy to His Church unfolds the mission:

  •       Submit to Jesus Christ as the One to Whom has been granted power in Heaven and on Earth;
  •       Cast your sin under His blood and receive His righteousness;
  •       Love others as you would love yourself by serving them with compassion and making disciples of Jesus Christ;
  •       Grow together in your knowledge of and love for Jesus Christ; and,
  •       Be led by the Spirit, Who will never leave us or forsake us.
           
In secular organizations, leadership takes stock of its members, seeks to align those members to the mission and strategy, analyzes strengths and weaknesses of members, equips and assigns those members to appropriate tasks that accurately fulfill the mission and strategy, all the while recognizing that diversity among members must be encouraged (rather than squashed) and channeled towards effectiveness (as defined by the mission and strategy). In the Church, Christ does exactly this through the power of the Holy Spirit according to the Word of God. This makes perfect sense, seeing as how God created the science of organizational behavior. Scientists are only privileged to discover it. A key to understanding organizational behavior is the God-given need within each person to be valued and enriched by the organization in which he/she exists. Without individuals being allowed to embrace their diversity as an important part of the team, they are listless, frustrated, confused, and often left feeling guilty for not fitting in.
           
Ephesians expresses these truths through word pictures such as a building with many stones in their own place uniquely crafted by the Holy Spirit. I Corinthians also compares the local church to the human body, all parts necessary and uniquely gifted by the Holy Spirit. Communication among Believers in a local church should exalt this diversity both verbally and nonverbally. Using communication, verbal and nonverbal, to squash this diversity is not only unkind but is an obstacle to the work of the Holy Spirit in the midst of that local church. This diversity is deeply unified, not around gifts and personalities but around the Gospel (as is declared in Corinthians). Diversity is not only permissible, it is vital if we desire to see the Holy Spirit equip and grow the Church.

Understandably, any local church or brand of local churches will naturally have their own flavor as they seek to carry out Christ's mission and strategy in their community. But each and every local church ought to accurately reflect Christ's mission and strategy for His Church, which is inflexibly Gospel-centered. When principles of organizational behavior are applied to the current Fundamentalist Movement, four key characteristics emerge to challenge both the unity and diversity of the Church. These characteristics are certainly not limited to Fundamentalism, but they provide a clear framework for understanding and explaining the practical theological errors within:      
           
These behavioral characteristics are not unique to Fundamentalism. Many individual churches and denominations will naturally exhibit one or more of these behavioral characteristics. 
           
The warped practical theology of modern day Fundamentalism can be primarily credited to a deviation from Christ's mission and strategy for the Church. While there are increasingly more high-profile cases of physical, sexual, and spiritual abuse within Fundamentalism (and other evangelical brands), we will not explore the obvious moral infractions exhibited by extreme cases. Instead, my purpose is to venture deeper into the less-obvious (until exposed) philosophies within Fundamentalism that are producing hundreds and hundreds of spiritual abuse victims each year. Many of the subtleties of the behavioral characteristics described above may not be visible from the pews but become quite obvious as one enters the "belly of the beast." The practical theological errors are so much more than shallow arguments over musical styles and dress code: they are misconceptions that have been profoundly installed into our rational cognition. Mere pulpit preaching did not do this, but the powerful reinforcement of these practical theological errors through the organizational behavior of modern day Fundamentalism did.
           
As my wife and I hosted Sneads Ferry Fellowship Church in our home in its infancy, we ministered side-by-side with a great group of military families. The Holy Spirit miraculously kept us unified even through challenging circumstances. I am sorrowful to recall moments where I fell prey to my own Fundamentalist mentality and effectively quenched the Holy Spirit at Sneads Ferry Fellowship Church. At a time when my own ambitions for the future of our church got ahead of what God intended to do, the Holy Spirit used Jim (a dear friend and vital member) to make quiet suggestions that, had I listened, would have saved us from unintentionally hurting two families in the church. Jim holds no seminary or counseling degrees from a liberal arts university, but he was a member of the body, and the Holy Spirit used him just as powerfully as any evangelist or pastor. At least two other scenarios burn in my brain where the Holy Spirit offered practical wisdom through unexpected people, and instead of listening and watching for the Spirit to work, I reverted to endorsing some form of quenching the diversity and unity of Sneads Ferry Fellowship Church. Thankfully, there are also many wonderful memories where diversity and unity were upheld through the work of the Holy Spirit in our midst. My wife and I were so blessed to have been a part of SFFC before the church closed its doors.


No comments:

Post a Comment